Republican senators request briefing on DOJ 'spying' probe
Two top Republican senators want the Department of Justice (DOJ) to brief them on its efforts to investigate alleged “spying” during the 2016 election after Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrSessions: It’s time to accept the results of the Mueller report and move on George Conway lashes out at ‘Deranged Donald’ on Twitter The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump tells House investigators ‘no’ MORE told lawmakers that he was looking into the issue.
Sens. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonGOP senator: ‘No problem’ with Mueller testifying The Hill’s Morning Report — Category 5 Mueller storm to hit today GOP senators double down on demand for Clinton email probe documents MORE (R-Wis.) and Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyCongress can retire the retirement crisis On The Money: Inside the Mueller report | Cain undeterred in push for Fed seat | Analysis finds modest boost to economy from new NAFTA | White House says deal will give auto sector B boost The 7 most interesting nuggets from the Mueller report MORE (R-Iowa) — the chairman of the Homeland Security and Finance committees, respectively — sent Barr a letter on Thursday pressing him for details on his review.
“We share your concerns about these activities, and are troubled by the apparent unauthorized disclosures of surveillance efforts and other classified information during the same time period,” the two senators wrote in their letter.
The letter comes after Barr sparked a political firestorm when he told lawmakers during a hearing earlier this month that he believed “spying did occur” against President TrumpDonald John TrumpForget the spin: Five unrefuted Mueller Report revelations Lara Trump: Merkel admitting migrants ‘one of the worst things that ever happened to Germany’ Financial satisfaction hits record high: survey MORE‘s campaign during the 2016 election.
“I think spying did occur. The question is whether it was predicated, adequately predicated,” Barr said.
Pressed later on his comments, he added that he was “not saying improper surveillance occurred. I am saying I am concerned about it, and I am looking into it.”
In addition to a briefing, Grassley and Johnson are asking Barr to detail the “nature and extent” of his review, how he plans to get information from individuals who have left the FBI, what steps he has taken to investigate if the FBI had “unauthorized contacts” with reporters and if he would share his findings with Congress once finished.
Grassley and Johnson also want to know how many counter-intelligence briefings were provided to Trump administration officials during the transition period leading up to the inauguration.
Republicans, including Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamBarr to testify before Senate panel next week on Mueller report Kushner saying immigration plan will be ‘neutral’ on legal admissions: report Africa’s women can change a continent: Will Ivanka give them her full support? MORE (S.C.), are eager to turn the page from special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE‘s probe into Russian election meddling. They are digging in for their own investigations into other Obama-era scandals, including the handling of the probe into Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonForget the spin: Five unrefuted Mueller Report revelations Former senators launching effort to help Dems win rural votes Biden’s announcement was a general election message, says political analyst MORE‘s private email server and a controversial research dossier compiled against then-candidate Trump.
Grassley and Johnson also used their letter to try to highlight information for Barr, which they write “may assist” his review of the 2016 election, including flagging text messages between former FBI officials Peter Strzok and attorney Lisa Page, where they appear to discuss logistics for a briefing and trying to develop “potential relationships.”
“Were these efforts done to gain better communication between the respective parties, or were the briefings used as intelligence gathering operations?” Grassley and Johnson ask in their letter. “Any improper FBI surveillance activities that were conducted before or after the 2016 election must be brought to light and properly addressed.”